The Federal Labour Court docket (Bundesarbeitsgericht) dominated on 29 April 2021 (docket quantity: 8 AZR 267/20) that, in precept, the employer might declare reimbursement of required investigation prices from the worker. Topic to reimbursement are essential prices incurred by the intervention of a specialised legislation agency if the employer has commissioned it to conduct investigations into the worker primarily based on a concrete suspicion of great misconduct. The employer should substantiate the need of the prices in every case by displaying that the prices are primarily based on an inexpensive suspicion which has been confirmed. Within the particular case, the Federal Labour Court docket rejected the employer’s declare for damages for investigation prices of a legislation agency as a result of the need of the investigative measures towards the worker weren’t sufficiently substantiated and confirmed in court docket.

Though the Federal Labour Court docket units excessive requirements for the reimbursement of investigation prices attributable to the worker’s misconduct, it additionally offers sensible recommendation for such a declare. Consequently, with acceptable preparation, reimbursement could be attainable in particular person circumstances sooner or later.

1.  Details

Whistle-blowers supplied details about a possible extreme misconduct of the plaintiff. As a result of this particular suspicion, the employer determined to provoke an investigation, performed by an exterior legislation agency. The investigations revealed that the worker had dedicated varied breaches of responsibility to the detriment of the employer with monetary damages within the six-figure vary. In his operate as buying supervisor, the plaintiff allowed himself to be invited by enterprise companions to Champions League matches and in addition made a number of journeys with out official trigger which he charged to the employer. Following the preliminary investigations, the plaintiff was given extraordinary termination with out discover.  After the plaintiff’s motion for cover towards dismissal was rejected by a ultimate court docket determination, the employer demanded compensation for the prices of the legislation agency that had investigated the worker’s alleged breaches of responsibility. The Labour Court docket dismissed the counterclaim for damages, the second occasion upheld it to the extent of EUR 66,500.

2.  Ruling

The Federal Labour Court docket dominated that an employer’s declare for damages typically extends to the prices incurred because of the intervention of a specialised legislation agency if the next situations are fulfilled:

    • the legislation agency was commissioned to analyze the worker on the event of a concrete suspicion of great misconduct on the a part of the worker, and
    • the worker was convicted by the investigation of a severe intentional breach of contractual responsibility or a tortious act, and
    • the character and extent of the investigative measures had been essential for an inexpensive, economically-minded employer beneath the circumstances of the person case.

Due to his intentional behaviour the worker couldn’t discuss with the availability which regulates that within the first occasion of the labour court docket proceedings every social gathering has to bear its personal lawyer’s charges (part 12a Labour Court docket Act [Arbeitsgerichtsgesetz]). The Court docket acknowledged that in such a case the appliance of this provision was inappropriate.

As well as, the Court docket specified that not solely inner investigations are essentially required. Such investigations can be carried out by exterior consultants, for instance if there should not sufficient capacities or not sufficient skilled workers throughout the firm itself.

The court docket’s necessities for proving the need of the investigative measures are extremely related in follow. On the one hand, the time spent, and the measures taken, have to be clearly specified with regard to every alleged conduct. As well as, the recoverable prices of fact-finding have to be distinguished from authorized recommendation.

3.  Conclusion

Good preparation and documentation through the investigation are important for profitable reimbursement. What’s required is a precise documentation of the investigative measures in line with sort and scope, for instance in a desk. Every investigative step needs to be recorded with the related suspicion, the time spent for investigations and the outcome. As well as, it needs to be proven whether or not any outcomes of the investigation have given rise to additional investigations.

Must Read

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here